Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glidos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 14:53, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Glidos[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article about a software some guy wrote once. damiens.rf 17:51, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (banter) @ 19:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- I agree with the nominator. This article is referenced to nothing but the software's home page, and I can't find anything more. Reyk _YO! 08:53, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔ 05:16, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not enough secondary source coverage (?) to warrant an article on this topic. It did not have any meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources search, and there are no worthwhile redirect targets. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources show in the future. czar ♔ 06:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.